The 30 Under 30 Twitter List

by DShan on August 19, 2009

Post image for The 30 Under 30 Twitter List

Today has already been incredibly hectic, on and offline.  I got out of my morning meetings a few hours ago and immediately wanted to play some catch online, especially due to the incredibly insightful commenting happening on my last post.  Seriously…there are some brains below that post.  I’m planning a follow-up to that to highlight some male bloggers I’m aware of, but if you’ve got some you dig, please leave a note over there in the comments.

Anyway, I sit down and I send some of you cool cats tweet replies and BAM, I find out I’m listed on Len Kendall’s 30 Under 30 Tweeters list, which I had no idea was even happening.  I was totally blindsided and hugely flattered.  I sort of didn’t know what to say, who to say it to, or how it happened.  The hashtag if you want to drop in on Twitter to find other honorees is #30u30t.

As Len put it, “You could say that #30u30t mirrors the NCAA Top 25 Coaches Poll…except for microblogging.

I’m still totally stunned, but I’m moreso impressed with the approach he took to building this list.  There’s a lot of different sources out there trying to tell you who to follow, and nearly all of them rank everyone based on some metric like following ratios, retweets, and the rest.  They all tend to look the same, and they all tend to encourage some sort of competition or something.

Twitter in general is slowly moving away from this behavior; the mad rush to have the most followers has passed, I think.  It certainly doesn’t hold up to scrutiny in the real value of the tool, and as people get more and more accustomed to the environment I think they see that numbers matter a lot less than actual value.

Len’s effort to produce a list (unranked, and called Mentors) of useful young twitter users kind of falls in line with the way I think people should approach twitter.  All social tools, actually.

Even beyond that, the list is noted as a starting line, not a finish line.  Version 1 means a Version 2, and because social media is constantly moving, so should the relative value of the people involved.  No one gets a free pass.  You don’t get to join a community and then act like an idiot, right?  You don’t get to build trust and then undermine it.  The web is reflecting human behavior more than ever before and the one thing we all have the hardest time doing is trusting one another.

Trust will always be the currency, and because there’s an ebb and flow to that, our efforts to highlight people who really add value or make themselves trustworthy should represent that.

I hope my humble amazement at inclusion has been fully expressed, because I really am touched by the mention.

However, I more so want to give Len and the team he put together kudos for the way they approached the whole thing.

What about you?  In your opinion, who’s young and kicking butt online?

If you're new here, you should subscribe to my RSS feed here.

  • i never ever claim to know who's who. that's why i follow people like you. you pay much better attention to that stuff than i do.

    i got something else out of this post though. at one point quite awhile ago now you and i were chatting about your web identity and who you wanted to be, how you wanted to streamline everything into one clear message. i've watched for that since then and i think you pinpointed it here. i think you've had it figured out for some time, which is evidenced by your inclusion on this list among many other indicators, but for some reason, today particularly, i think the Derek you're striving to be shone right on through, clearly and concisely.

    congratulations. the recognition is much deserved.
  • Thank you. That's rewarding, because I'm not really sure I've been deliberate about a tailored 'brand' but I'm very much trying to be present in the world. It's not for recognition either, it's because I find it so rewarding.
  • continuing, if i may (i'm not so sure this isn't completely off topic), i don't think you need to be deliberate about a tailored 'brand' because i think you've evolved into it. i've been listening to you long enough that i have a rough idea of the things that really catch your attention, the things that are important to you, the things that continually come up in your writing, etc. you're a very genuine person and simply "being present" is all that's necessary. the fact that you're not doing any of it for recognition is just more evidence that you deserve it.

    like i said, everything i know of you just came together very nicely here, and maybe it's just my own perception, but again, i find you incredibly deserving of your spot on this list, and this proved it about ten times over.

    i'm done singing your praises now. it's not like you asked me to. ;)
  • Eff. "Facebook User" is me.
  • Facebook User
    My vote was for Karen Hartline (@khartline). She inspires me and I don't think she knows it.
  • Good suggestion, Jenn.

    What is UP with FB? It's gotta be me.
  • Derek,

    Your review of this project means a lot to me. Thank you for your appreciation of the time and effort that went into it. As you alluded to, human power isn't the easiest way to go about something like this, but I think it s the best way and the most helpful. There will indeed be a volume 2 and hopefully even more judges available to refine the process more.

    Congrats and look forward to engaging with you more.

    Len
  • Thanks for dropping by Len. I think the most flattering part of this was that you guys put all the effort into it. A group contemplated it. It represents recognition extremely well.

    I look forward to engaging too.
blog comments powered by Disqus


Previous post:

Next post: